Rise of the Planet of the Apes movie review

Last week I watched Rise of the Planet of the Apes on DVD. I wasn’t expecting much from it to be honest, but it looked vaguely interesting. I stuck it into the player expecting to watch maybe 30 minutes of it. In the end it was quite entertaining and I ended up watching the whole thing.

In a nutshell it’s a prequel story setting up how the apes got intelligent. Never mind that the third movie in the series established a terminator-style time loop where Roddy McDowell’s ape went back to the 1970s.

In the new movie we have James Franco (Harry from the Spider-man series) trying to develop medicine that will cure people from alzheimer’s disease. He has a personal reason for doing so as his father (played by John Lithgow) is deteriorating from the condition.

The medicine is being tested on apes to whom it gives a greater than normal intelligence. He has promising results from a female ape he calls “Bright Eyes” but the research gets halted. He takes her baby ape Caesar home and realises the intelligence has been passed on to him.

The apes all appear to have beon done by CGI and it’s pretty impressive. Much screen time is taken by Ceaser and his ape followers and the performances are good enough to forget you are watching an extended visual effect.

There’s lots of nice little nods to the original movies. I probably missed some but here are a few of the ones I caught.

  • At the start of the movie apes are hunted and captured in a jungle much like the humans are in the first movie.
  • Obviously naming the main ape Caesar.
  • His mother is nicknamed Bright Eyes – What Charlton Heston’s astronaut character was called by the apes in the first movie.
  • A female ape called Cornelia is mentioned.
  • Caesar makes a model of the Statue of Liberty.
  • In the ape house a nasty keeper shouts “It’s a madhouse!”
  • He also gets Hestons’s other famous line “Take your stinking paws off me, you damn dirty ape!”
  • Caesar gets hosed with water in his cell.
  • We see Caesar ride a horse near the end of the movie.
  • Towards the end of the movie a space mission blasts off for Mars. Later contact is lost with the crew. Is an astronaut called Taylor on board?
  • We get to see chimps, an orangutan and a gorilla – the three “castes” of apes from the original movies.

I suspect the movie may have had it’s ending altered to not be quite as bleak as it could be. We discover that the aerosol medicine that makes the apes more intelligent causes the death of at least one human lab worker when he gets infected. Before he dies he managers to sneeze blood over another human, the implication being he infected him as well. I assumed the movie would end with humans either subcuming to the illness or survivors becoming less intelligent.

However it was an entertaining movie well made. I suspect I’ll watch it again before too long.

Update. It turns out there is a further scene during the closing credits that does give the movie a bleak ending. The infected neighbour (played by David Hewlett from Stargate Atlantis) is an airline pilot and brings his infection to the airport, thereby spreading it throughout the world. So that’s jolly.

Agent Pierce from Burn Notice aka Lauren Stamile

Over the last year or two I was introduced to the solid piece of TV entertainment that is Burn Notice. The show is set in Miami and features Michael Westen, a former CIA spy who was “burned” by the Agency. He spends each season getting closer to the truth about why he was burned, and also manages to help people.

The opening credits are endlessly quotable, and the show has given us such memorable lines like “Chuck Finlay is forever”.

Anyway, on to the reason for this post. The recently completed season 5 gave me an additional reason to watch the show, namely Michael’s new CIA handler Agent Pierce as played by Lauren Stamile. I kind of liked her in a vague way to start with but by the middle of the season I was watching out for her and hoping she would be in the episode.

Therefore Lauren is the first recipient of my occasional “I Like Her, She’s Pretty” award.

 

Apollo 18 movie review

Recently I watched the movie Apollo 18 on DVD and I thought I’d write up my thoughts about it.

20120115-163725.jpg

The movie is made in the style of The Blair Witch Project and Cloverfield as a documentary that has been put together from some recovered footage. In this case the footage is from a secret Department of Defense Apollo mission to the moon in 1974.

Most of the footage is made up of video camera images from inside the lunar module and 16 mm camera footage that the astronauts take when outside on the lunar surface. There has obviously been a lot of effort from the filmmakers to get the footage to be as authentically 1970s looking as possible. Their efforts have paid off as it looks indistinguishable from the actual Apollo footage dropped in here and there.

The story itself is faily slight. The astronauts have been sent up to the moon supposedly to set up some Cold War monitoring equipment. While there they discover some footprints that lead them to a Soviet lunar lander and a dead cosmonaut. Strange things happen such as the American flag disappearing and the lunar rover being flipped over.

Basically it transpires tha some moon rocks are not rocks at all but nasty little creatures that manage to infect one of the astronauts. Will the other astronaut make it home?

Visually the recreation of the moon and the hardware is impressive. The moon looks suitably grey and it’s nice to see the Russian lander look much like the the actual one that was developed in the 1960s and revealed years after the space race was over.

Allow me a little nitpicking though. We hear sounds such as the one that accompanies the charging of the astronaut’s strobe light. (Although perhaps we’ll ignore that as he may have had it wired into his suit.) Also the astronaut runs from danger at one point. In all the Apollo footage I’ve seen the astronauts had to “bunny hop” to get around. And without giving too much away the 16mm footage appeared to be destroyed at the end of the movie. So how did the documentary makers get their hands on it?

In summary a technically interesting little movie that’s worth a look but I doubt I’d want to watch it often.

The Innocents by Gerald Seymour

For the last year or two I’ve been posting the occasional piece of book related news to my blog, Books What I Like. Now I have this WordPress thing up and running perhaps it makes sense to post things here.

So here’s my first piece of book news. Gerald Seymour’s next novel has been listed for publication on Amazon UK. It’s titled The Innocents, although the blurb seems to imply it might be called The Graveyard Team.

Based on the blurb the book appears to focus on the fight against organised crime.

The book is due for publication on 5 July 2012 by Hodder and will in fact be the fourth Seymour novel to be published by Hodder since 2009.

All Seymour’s novels are high quality and mark my reading highlight of the year, but 2011’s A Deniable Death was outstanding even by his standards and will be a tough one to follow.

You can read the blurb on Gerald Seymour – The Art of Danger.

March update. Now the title seems to be Outsiders. Time will tell.

1 27 28 29